the African Eumolpinae site (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae)
Cocotteumolpus cuprescens Bechyné, 1957
Deuterotrichia vinsoni Bechyné, 1957
Lymidus bimaculicollis (Jacoby, 1902)
Lymidus lateralis (Jacoby, 1898)
Lymidus mauritiae (Jacoby, 1898)
Pheloticus dilutus (Lefèvre, 1877)
Trichostola alluaudi Jacoby, 1898
Trichostola aurata Jacoby, 1898
Trichostola berliozi berliozi Bechyné, 1957
Trichostola callitrichia Bechyné,1957
Trichostola cariei Berlioz, 1919
Trichostola chapuisi Jacoby, 1898 (?)
Trichostola chrysoptera Bechyné, 1957
Trichostola collaris collaris Berlioz, 1915
Trichostola cribricollis Berlioz, 1919
Trichostola emmerezi Berlioz, 1919
Trichostola evops evops Berlioz, 1915
Trichostola fasciatipennis Jacoby, 1902
Trichostola femoralis Jacoby, 1902
Trichostola intermedia Berlioz, 1915
Trichostola mameti Bechyné, 1957
Trichostola ornata Berlioz, 1915
Trichostola perilampina Bechyné, 1957
Trichostola pilula Berlioz, 1915
Trichostola puncticollis Jacoby, 1902
Trichostola striatipennis Jacoby, 1898
Trichostola tenuepunctata Berlioz, 1915
Trichostola thoracica Jacoby, 1902
Trichostola umbilicata Bechyné, 1957
Trichostola variegata Jacoby, 1898
Trichostola vestita vestita (Boheman, 1858)
Trichostola vinsoni Bechyné, 1957
Vinsoneumolpus notatus Bechyné, 1958
Vinsoneumolpus puberulus (Boheman, 1858)
Vinsoneumolpus subalutaceus Bechyné, 1958
Rodrigues Is:
Trichostola pauliani Vinson, 1961 nom. nud.
African Eumolpinae checklist: Mauritius and Rodrigues Is.


back to main page

Distributions are given by Countries in their present political arrangement. Some unclear, usually old citations are reported with a ?, as well as some doubtful ones. Where a species is reported from a boundary zone between two or more Countries, this species is here reported for all the interested Countries. Most of the data are taken from literature and they were not verified; due to the critical situation in the taxonomy of the African Eumolpinae, except for a few groups reviewed by specialists, all citations are intended in need of confirmation. Only a few clearly erroneous citations, or with a high possibility to be so, are not taken into consideration.

I am really interested in receiving informations about published data which are not included in this list.